1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo vs. 1997 Citroen Berlingo

To start off, 1997 Citroen Berlingo is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo would be higher. At 1,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo (228 HP @ 8800 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 1997 Citroen Berlingo. (74 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo should accelerate faster than 1997 Citroen Berlingo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Citroen Berlingo weights approximately 200 kg more than 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo.

Because 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Citroen Berlingo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo (306 Nm @ 7000 RPM) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Citroen Berlingo. (110 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Citroen Berlingo.

Compare all specifications:

1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo 1997 Citroen Berlingo
Make Alfa Romeo Citroen
Model Navajo Berlingo
Year Released 1976 1997
Engine Position Middle Front
Engine Size 1995 cc 1397 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 228 HP 74 HP
Engine RPM 8800 RPM 5750 RPM
Torque 306 Nm 110 Nm
Torque RPM 7000 RPM 3300 RPM
Engine Bore Size 78 mm 75 mm
Engine Stroke Size 52.2 mm 77 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 10.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 870 kg 1070 kg
Vehicle Length 3810 mm 4110 mm
Vehicle Width 1870 mm 1730 mm
Vehicle Height 1060 mm 1810 mm
Wheelbase Size 2440 mm 2700 mm