1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo vs. 1998 Volvo C70

To start off, 1998 Volvo C70 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 1998 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Volvo C70 (236 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo. (228 HP @ 8800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Volvo C70 weights approximately 610 kg more than 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Volvo C70 (340 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo. (306 Nm @ 7000 RPM). This means 1998 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo.

Compare all specifications:

1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo 1998 Volvo C70
Make Alfa Romeo Volvo
Model Navajo C70
Year Released 1976 1998
Engine Position Middle Front
Engine Size 1995 cc 2435 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 228 HP 236 HP
Engine RPM 8800 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 306 Nm 340 Nm
Torque RPM 7000 RPM 2700 RPM
Engine Bore Size 78 mm 81.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 52.2 mm 90 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 8.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 870 kg 1480 kg
Vehicle Length 3810 mm 4730 mm
Vehicle Width 1870 mm 1830 mm
Vehicle Height 1060 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2440 mm 2670 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]