1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo vs. 2003 BMW X3

To start off, 2003 BMW X3 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo would be higher. At 2,995 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 BMW X3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo (228 HP @ 8800 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2003 BMW X3. (201 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo should accelerate faster than 2003 BMW X3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW X3 weights approximately 1060 kg more than 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo.

Because 2003 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW X3 (410 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo. (306 Nm @ 7000 RPM). This means 2003 BMW X3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo. 2003 BMW X3 has automatic transmission and 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo has manual transmission. 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 BMW X3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo 2003 BMW X3
Make Alfa Romeo BMW
Model Navajo X3
Year Released 1976 2003
Engine Position Middle Front
Engine Size 1995 cc 2995 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 228 HP 201 HP
Engine RPM 8800 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 306 Nm 410 Nm
Torque RPM 7000 RPM 1500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 78 mm 84 mm
Engine Stroke Size 52.2 mm 90 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 17.0:1
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 870 kg 1930 kg
Vehicle Length 3810 mm 4570 mm
Vehicle Width 1870 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1060 mm 1680 mm
Wheelbase Size 2440 mm 2730 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]