1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo (228 HP) has 85 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | Navajo | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1976 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1060 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2490 mm |