1976 Alpine A 310 vs. 1952 Alvis TB 21
To start off, 1976 Alpine A 310 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alvis TB 21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alvis TB 21 would be higher. At 2,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Alvis TB 21 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Alpine A 310 (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1952 Alvis TB 21. (91 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Alpine A 310 should accelerate faster than 1952 Alvis TB 21.
Let's talk about torque, 1976 Alpine A 310 (209 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Alvis TB 21. (204 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1976 Alpine A 310 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Alvis TB 21.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Alpine A 310 | 1952 Alvis TB 21 | |
| Make | Alpine | Alvis |
| Model | A 310 | TB 21 |
| Year Released | 1976 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 2664 cc | 2992 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 91 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 209 Nm | 204 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 73 mm | 90 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2750 mm |
