1976 Alpine A 310 vs. 1972 Chrysler Charger

To start off, 1976 Alpine A 310 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chrysler Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chrysler Charger would be higher. At 3,523 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Chrysler Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Alpine A 310 (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1972 Chrysler Charger. (138 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Alpine A 310 should accelerate faster than 1972 Chrysler Charger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Chrysler Charger weights approximately 380 kg more than 1976 Alpine A 310.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Chrysler Charger (272 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Alpine A 310. (209 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1972 Chrysler Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Alpine A 310.

Compare all specifications:

1976 Alpine A 310 1972 Chrysler Charger
Make Alpine Chrysler
Model A 310 Charger
Year Released 1976 1972
Body Type Coupe Coupe
Engine Position Rear Front
Engine Size 2664 cc 3523 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 148 HP 138 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4400 RPM
Torque 209 Nm 272 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 1800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 980 kg 1360 kg
Vehicle Length 4190 mm 4570 mm
Vehicle Width 1650 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 1160 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2280 mm 2680 mm