1976 Alpine A 310 vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2004 Ford Ecosport is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Alpine A 310. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Alpine A 310 would be higher. At 2,662 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Alpine A 310 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Alpine A 310 (148 HP) has 54 more horse power than 2004 Ford Ecosport. (94 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Alpine A 310 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1976 Alpine A 310 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Alpine A 310. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Alpine A 310 | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Alpine | Ford |
Model | A 310 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1976 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 2662 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 94 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2490 mm |