1976 Alpine A 442 vs. 2000 Ford e-Ka

To start off, 2000 Ford e-Ka is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Alpine A 442. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Alpine A 442 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Alpine A 442 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Alpine A 442 (484 HP @ 9900 RPM) has 395 more horse power than 2000 Ford e-Ka. (89 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Alpine A 442 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford e-Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford e-Ka weights approximately 468 kg more than 1976 Alpine A 442.

Because 1976 Alpine A 442 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Alpine A 442. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford e-Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Ford e-Ka has automatic transmission and 1976 Alpine A 442 has manual transmission. 1976 Alpine A 442 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford e-Ka will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1976 Alpine A 442 2000 Ford e-Ka
Make Alpine Ford
Model A 442 e-Ka
Year Released 1976 2000
Engine Position Rear Front
Engine Size 1997 cc 1758 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 484 HP 89 HP
Engine RPM 9900 RPM 6000 RPM
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 2 seats
Vehicle Weight 740 kg 1208 kg
Wheelbase Size 2430 mm 2730 mm