1976 Alpine A 442 vs. 2002 Ford Econovan
To start off, 2002 Ford Econovan is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Alpine A 442. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Alpine A 442 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Alpine A 442 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Alpine A 442 (484 HP @ 9900 RPM) has 394 more horse power than 2002 Ford Econovan. (90 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Alpine A 442 should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Econovan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Econovan weights approximately 555 kg more than 1976 Alpine A 442.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Alpine A 442 | 2002 Ford Econovan | |
| Make | Alpine | Ford |
| Model | A 442 | Econovan |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1789 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 484 HP | 90 HP |
| Engine RPM | 9900 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1295 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2210 mm |
