1976 Aston Martin AM Vantage vs. 2003 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Aston Martin AM Vantage. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Aston Martin AM Vantage would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1976 Aston Martin AM Vantage. (321 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1976 Aston Martin AM Vantage. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Aston Martin AM Vantage weights approximately 258 kg more than 2003 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Aston Martin AM Vantage | 2003 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Ford |
| Model | AM Vantage | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3995 cc | 4601 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 321 HP | 400 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1492 kg |
