1976 Audi 100 vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1976 Audi 100 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Audi 100 (114 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Audi 100 should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 18 kg more than 1976 Audi 100.
Let's talk about torque, 1976 Audi 100 (168 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1976 Audi 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Audi 100 | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Audi | Triumph |
Model | 100 | 2000 |
Year Released | 1976 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 168 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1152 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 64 L |