1976 Audi 100 vs. 2000 Mahindra CL
To start off, 2000 Mahindra CL is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Audi 100 would be higher. At 2,522 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mahindra CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Audi 100 (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2000 Mahindra CL. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Audi 100 should accelerate faster than 2000 Mahindra CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mahindra CL weights approximately 130 kg more than 1976 Audi 100.
Because 2000 Mahindra CL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Audi 100. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mahindra CL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mahindra CL (165 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Audi 100. (163 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2000 Mahindra CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Audi 100 | 2000 Mahindra CL | |
| Make | Audi | Mahindra |
| Model | 100 | CL |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2142 cc | 2522 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Torque | 163 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2040 mm |
