1976 Audi 100 vs. 2002 Jaguar XJR

To start off, 2002 Jaguar XJR is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Audi 100 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJR (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 320 more horse power than 1976 Audi 100. (70 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 1976 Audi 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 455 kg more than 1976 Audi 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJR (525 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 403 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Audi 100. (122 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Audi 100. 2002 Jaguar XJR has automatic transmission and 1976 Audi 100 has manual transmission. 1976 Audi 100 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Jaguar XJR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1976 Audi 100 2002 Jaguar XJR
Make Audi Jaguar
Model 100 XJR
Year Released 1976 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1986 cc 4196 cc
Engine Cylinders 5 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 70 HP 390 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 6100 RPM
Torque 122 Nm 525 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 76.5 mm 86.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86.4 mm 90.3 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 23.0:1 9.1:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1210 kg 1665 kg
Vehicle Length 4600 mm 5100 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1870 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2910 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 85 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]