1976 Audi 100 vs. 2009 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Audi 100 would be higher. At 6,162 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V (542 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 472 more horse power than 1976 Audi 100. (70 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1976 Audi 100.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V (550 Nm @ 6200 RPM) has 428 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Audi 100. (122 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Audi 100 | 2009 Cadillac CTS-V | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | 100 | CTS-V |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1986 cc | 6162 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 542 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 122 Nm | 550 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 23.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2890 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 68 L |
