1976 Audi 100 vs. 2009 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Audi 100 would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1976 Audi 100. (85 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1976 Audi 100.
Because 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Audi 100. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Audi 100. (124 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Audi 100 | 2009 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | Audi | Citroen |
| Model | 100 | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1586 cc | 2359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 124 Nm | 232 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 87 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
