1976 Audi 100 vs. 2010 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2010 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Audi 100 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (137 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1976 Audi 100. (70 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1976 Audi 100.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Audi 100. (122 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Audi 100 | 2010 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Audi | Nissan |
| Model | 100 | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1986 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 137 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 122 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 23.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 65 L |
