1976 Audi 50 vs. 1952 Holden FX
To start off, 1976 Audi 50 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1952 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Audi 50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Audi 50 | 1952 Holden FX | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | 50 | FX |
Year Released | 1976 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 771 cc | 2166 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 51 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | 4-speed manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1710 mm |