1976 Audi 50 vs. 1963 Toyota Corona
To start off, 1976 Audi 50 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Toyota Corona would be higher. At 997 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Toyota Corona is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1963 Toyota Corona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Toyota Corona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Audi 50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Audi 50 | 1963 Toyota Corona | |
| Make | Audi | Toyota |
| Model | 50 | Corona |
| Year Released | 1976 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 771 cc | 997 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 38 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | 4-speed manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1500 mm |
