1976 Audi 50 vs. 1984 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1984 Ford Falcon is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Audi 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Audi 50 would be higher. At 3,273 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1984 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Audi 50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Audi 50 | 1984 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | 50 | Falcon |
Year Released | 1976 | 1984 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 771 cc | 3273 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 120 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1870 mm |