1976 Audi 50 vs. 1998 Panoz Q9
To start off, 1998 Panoz Q9 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Audi 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Audi 50 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Panoz Q9 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1998 Panoz Q9 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Panoz Q9. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Audi 50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1998 Panoz Q9 has automatic transmission and 1976 Audi 50 has manual transmission. 1976 Audi 50 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Panoz Q9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Audi 50 | 1998 Panoz Q9 | |
Make | Audi | Panoz |
Model | 50 | Q9 |
Year Released | 1976 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 771 cc | 6000 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | 4-speed manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |