1976 Audi 50 vs. 1999 Mazda 626
To start off, 1999 Mazda 626 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Audi 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Audi 50 would be higher. At 1,839 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Audi 50 | 1999 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | 50 | 626 |
Year Released | 1976 | 1999 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 771 cc | 1839 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | 4-speed manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1720 mm |