1976 Audi 50 vs. 2000 Bristol Blenheim
To start off, 2000 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Audi 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Audi 50 would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Bristol Blenheim is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Bristol Blenheim. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Audi 50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Bristol Blenheim has automatic transmission and 1976 Audi 50 has manual transmission. 1976 Audi 50 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Bristol Blenheim will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Audi 50 | 2000 Bristol Blenheim | |
| Make | Audi | Bristol |
| Model | 50 | Blenheim |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 771 cc | 5898 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 350 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | 4-speed manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1770 mm |
