1976 Audi 50 vs. 2000 Chevrolet SSR
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Audi 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Audi 50 would be higher. At 5,324 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Chevrolet SSR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chevrolet SSR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Audi 50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chevrolet SSR has automatic transmission and 1976 Audi 50 has manual transmission. 1976 Audi 50 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chevrolet SSR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Audi 50 | 2000 Chevrolet SSR | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | 50 | SSR |
Year Released | 1976 | 2000 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 771 cc | 5324 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 300 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | 4-speed manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 2000 mm |