1976 Audi 50 vs. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3
To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Audi 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Audi 50 would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 has automatic transmission and 1976 Audi 50 has manual transmission. 1976 Audi 50 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Audi 50 | 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | |
| Make | Audi | Chrysler |
| Model | 50 | ESX 3 |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 771 cc | 1499 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | 4-speed manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1890 mm |
