1976 Audi 50 vs. 2000 Ford Artic
To start off, 2000 Ford Artic is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Audi 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Audi 50 would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Ford Artic is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Artic. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Audi 50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Ford Artic has automatic transmission and 1976 Audi 50 has manual transmission. 1976 Audi 50 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Artic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Audi 50 | 2000 Ford Artic | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | 50 | Artic |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 771 cc | 3998 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 128 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | 4-speed manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 5240 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1830 mm |
