1976 Audi 50 vs. 2000 Ford Puma
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Audi 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Audi 50 would be higher. At 1,387 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Audi 50 | 2000 Ford Puma | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | 50 | Puma |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 771 cc | 1387 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | 4-speed manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1680 mm |
