1976 Audi 50 vs. 2001 Ford Econovan
To start off, 2001 Ford Econovan is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Audi 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Audi 50 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Ford Econovan is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Ford Econovan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Ford Econovan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Audi 50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Audi 50 | 2001 Ford Econovan | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | 50 | Econovan |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2001 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 771 cc | 1996 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 96 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | 4-speed manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1640 mm |
