1976 Audi 50 vs. 2006 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2006 Ford Falcon is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Audi 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Audi 50 would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Audi 50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Ford Falcon has automatic transmission and 1976 Audi 50 has manual transmission. 1976 Audi 50 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Ford Falcon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Audi 50 | 2006 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | 50 | Falcon |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 771 cc | 3984 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 200 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | 4-speed manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
