1976 Audi 50 vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Audi 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Audi 50 would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Toyota Matrix has automatic transmission and 1976 Audi 50 has manual transmission. 1976 Audi 50 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Toyota Matrix will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Audi 50 | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | 50 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1976 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 771 cc | 1800 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 132 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | 4-speed manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1765 mm |