1976 Austin Allegro vs. 1946 Lancia Ardea 3
To start off, 1976 Austin Allegro is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 would be higher. At 1,098 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Austin Allegro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Austin Allegro (44 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. (28 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Austin Allegro should accelerate faster than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Austin Allegro weights approximately 141 kg more than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Austin Allegro | 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 | |
| Make | Austin | Lancia |
| Model | Allegro | Ardea 3 |
| Year Released | 1976 | 1946 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 903 cc |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 28 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 815 kg | 674 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 3700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2440 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 29 L |
