1976 Austin Allegro vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS

To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ATS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ATS (268 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 224 more horse power than 1976 Austin Allegro. (44 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS should accelerate faster than 1976 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ATS weights approximately 715 kg more than 1976 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2013 Cadillac ATS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Cadillac ATS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ATS (353 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 279 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Austin Allegro. (74 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac ATS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Austin Allegro. 2013 Cadillac ATS has automatic transmission and 1976 Austin Allegro has manual transmission. 1976 Austin Allegro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac ATS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1976 Austin Allegro 2013 Cadillac ATS
Make Austin Cadillac
Model Allegro ATS
Year Released 1976 2013
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1098 cc 2000 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 44 HP 268 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 74 Nm 353 Nm
Torque RPM 2900 RPM 5500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 64.6 mm 86 mm
Engine Stroke Size 83.7 mm 86 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 815 kg 1530 kg
Vehicle Length 3200 mm 4643 mm
Vehicle Width 1620 mm 1806 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1417 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2776 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 48 L 61 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]