1976 Austin Princess vs. 1952 Triumph TR2
To start off, 1976 Austin Princess is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph TR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph TR2 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Triumph TR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Austin Princess weights approximately 295 kg more than 1952 Triumph TR2.
Because 1952 Triumph TR2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Triumph TR2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Austin Princess | 1952 Triumph TR2 | |
| Make | Austin | Triumph |
| Model | Princess | TR2 |
| Year Released | 1976 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1700 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 90 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 865 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2250 mm |
