1976 Austin Princess vs. 1978 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1978 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Austin Princess would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 790 kg more than 1976 Austin Princess.
Because 1978 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Austin Princess | 1978 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | Princess | Brougham |
Year Released | 1976 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1700 cc | 5032 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 5630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3090 mm |