1976 Austin Princess vs. 1989 Matra-Simca M25
To start off, 1989 Matra-Simca M25 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Austin Princess would be higher. At 1,764 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Matra-Simca M25 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1989 Matra-Simca M25 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Matra-Simca M25. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Austin Princess | 1989 Matra-Simca M25 | |
Make | Austin | Matra-Simca |
Model | Princess | M25 |
Year Released | 1976 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1700 cc | 1764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |