1976 Austin Princess vs. 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Austin Princess would be higher. At 4,198 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer weights approximately 1000 kg more than 1976 Austin Princess.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Austin Princess. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer has automatic transmission and 1976 Austin Princess has manual transmission. 1976 Austin Princess will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Austin Princess | 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer | |
| Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
| Model | Princess | Trailblazer |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1700 cc | 4198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 275 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 2160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2880 mm |
