1976 Austin Princess vs. 2000 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2000 Ford Ranger is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Austin Princess would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Ranger weights approximately 138 kg more than 1976 Austin Princess.
Because 2000 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Austin Princess | 2000 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | Princess | Ranger |
Year Released | 1976 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1700 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 135 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1298 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2800 mm |