1976 Austin Princess vs. 2004 MCC Silverpulse
To start off, 2004 MCC Silverpulse is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Austin Princess would be higher. At 1,700 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 MCC Silverpulse is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 MCC Silverpulse. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Austin Princess | 2004 MCC Silverpulse | |
| Make | Austin | MCC |
| Model | Princess | Silverpulse |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1700 cc | 699 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
