1976 Austin Princess vs. 2010 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XK is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Austin Princess would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jaguar XK weights approximately 536 kg more than 1976 Austin Princess.
Because 2010 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Jaguar XK has automatic transmission and 1976 Austin Princess has manual transmission. 1976 Austin Princess will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Jaguar XK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Austin Princess | 2010 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Austin | Jaguar |
Model | Princess | XK |
Year Released | 1976 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1700 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 385 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1696 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4793 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1328 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2751 mm |