1976 Austin Princess vs. 2010 Land Rover LR2
To start off, 2010 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Land Rover LR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Land Rover LR2 weights approximately 770 kg more than 1976 Austin Princess.
Because 2010 Land Rover LR2 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Austin Princess. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover LR2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Land Rover LR2 has automatic transmission and 1976 Austin Princess has manual transmission. 1976 Austin Princess will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Land Rover LR2 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Austin Princess | 2010 Land Rover LR2 | |
| Make | Austin | Land Rover |
| Model | Princess | LR2 |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1700 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 230 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4498 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1908 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2659 mm |
