1976 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace
To start off, 1976 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace would be higher. At 1,220 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace (72 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1976 Autobianchi A 112. (47 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace should accelerate faster than 1976 Autobianchi A 112. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Autobianchi A 112 weights approximately 240 kg more than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace.
Because 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Autobianchi A 112 | 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace | |
Make | Autobianchi | Simca |
Model | A 112 | Type 11 Monoplace |
Year Released | 1976 | 1949 |
Engine Size | 903 cc | 1220 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2250 mm |