1976 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1992 Volvo 960
To start off, 1992 Volvo 960 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Volvo 960 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Volvo 960 (187 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1976 Autobianchi A 112. (47 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Volvo 960 should accelerate faster than 1976 Autobianchi A 112. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Volvo 960 weights approximately 870 kg more than 1976 Autobianchi A 112. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 Volvo 960 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Volvo 960. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Autobianchi A 112 | 1992 Volvo 960 | |
Make | Autobianchi | Volvo |
Model | A 112 | 960 |
Year Released | 1976 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 903 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2780 mm |