1976 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2000 Smart ForFour
To start off, 2000 Smart ForFour is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Smart ForFour is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Smart ForFour (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1976 Autobianchi A 112. (47 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Smart ForFour should accelerate faster than 1976 Autobianchi A 112. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Smart ForFour weights approximately 315 kg more than 1976 Autobianchi A 112. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Autobianchi A 112 | 2000 Smart ForFour | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Smart |
| Model | A 112 | ForFour |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 903 cc | 1499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 975 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 3760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1460 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 47 L |
