1976 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2005 Chevrolet Tracker

To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker (98 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1976 Autobianchi A 112. (47 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1976 Autobianchi A 112.

Because 2005 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Autobianchi A 112. (63 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Autobianchi A 112.

Compare all specifications:

1976 Autobianchi A 112 2005 Chevrolet Tracker
Make Autobianchi Chevrolet
Model A 112 Tracker
Year Released 1976 2005
Body Type Hatchback SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 903 cc 1590 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 47 HP 98 HP
Engine RPM 6200 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 63 Nm 139 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 3240 mm 3860 mm
Vehicle Width 1490 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1700 mm
Wheelbase Size 2040 mm 2210 mm