1976 BMW 3.3 vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9

To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 BMW 3.3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 BMW 3.3 would be higher. At 3,724 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1976 BMW 3.3. (194 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1976 BMW 3.3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 BMW 3.3 weights approximately 314 kg more than 2009 Mazda CX-9.

Because 2009 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 BMW 3.3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 BMW 3.3. (285 Nm @ 4300 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 BMW 3.3.

Compare all specifications:

1976 BMW 3.3 2009 Mazda CX-9
Make BMW Mazda
Model 3.3 CX-9
Year Released 1976 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3295 cc 3724 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 194 HP 273 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 6250 RPM
Torque 285 Nm 366 Nm
Torque RPM 4300 RPM 4500 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 9.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1494 kg 1180 kg
Vehicle Length 4810 mm 5080 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1940 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1730 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2880 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 78 L 76 L