1976 BMW 628 vs. 2003 Isuzu Ascender
To start off, 2003 Isuzu Ascender is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 BMW 628. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 BMW 628 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Isuzu Ascender is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Isuzu Ascender (271 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1976 BMW 628. (185 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Isuzu Ascender should accelerate faster than 1976 BMW 628.
Because 2003 Isuzu Ascender is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 BMW 628. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Isuzu Ascender will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Isuzu Ascender (374 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 BMW 628. (260 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Isuzu Ascender will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 BMW 628.
Compare all specifications:
1976 BMW 628 | 2003 Isuzu Ascender | |
Make | BMW | Isuzu |
Model | 628 | Ascender |
Year Released | 1976 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2997 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 271 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 374 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 3280 mm |