1976 BMW 628 vs. 2009 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 BMW 628. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 BMW 628 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Impala (211 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1976 BMW 628. (185 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1976 BMW 628.
Because 1976 BMW 628 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 BMW 628. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Impala (291 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 BMW 628. (260 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 BMW 628.
Compare all specifications:
1976 BMW 628 | 2009 Chevrolet Impala | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 628 | Impala |
Year Released | 1976 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2997 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 211 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 291 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 64 L |