1976 BMW 630 vs. 1966 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1976 BMW 630 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1976 BMW 630. (173 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1976 BMW 630. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 567 kg more than 1976 BMW 630. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1976 BMW 630 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 BMW 630. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 BMW 630 | 1966 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 630 | DeVille |
Year Released | 1976 | 1966 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2986 cc | 7027 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1458 kg | 2025 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3300 mm |