1976 BMW 630 vs. 1995 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1995 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 BMW 630. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 BMW 630 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Cadillac DeVille (271 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1976 BMW 630. (182 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1976 BMW 630. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 254 kg more than 1976 BMW 630. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1976 BMW 630 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 BMW 630. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 BMW 630 | 1995 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 630 | DeVille |
| Year Released | 1976 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2986 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 271 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1451 kg | 1705 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 5330 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1950 mm |
