1976 BMW 630 vs. 2002 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2002 Jaguar XJ is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 BMW 630. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 BMW 630 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJ (301 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1976 BMW 630. (173 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1976 BMW 630. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 342 kg more than 1976 BMW 630. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJ (541 Nm) has 290 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 BMW 630. (251 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 BMW 630.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 BMW 630 | 2002 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | BMW | Jaguar |
| Model | 630 | XJ |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2986 cc | 4196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 173 HP | 301 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 541 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1458 kg | 1800 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3040 mm |
