1976 BMW 633 vs. 1973 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1976 BMW 633 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 BMW 633 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 BMW 633 (197 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1973 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 BMW 633 should accelerate faster than 1973 Mazda RX-2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 BMW 633 weights approximately 510 kg more than 1973 Mazda RX-2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 BMW 633 (285 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1976 BMW 633 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
1976 BMW 633 | 1973 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 633 | RX-2 |
Year Released | 1976 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3210 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2480 mm |